Skip to content
hubreven

Solution

Outbound that runs on a list somebody bought

Building pipeline properly means constructing the data first: enrichment waterfalls, fit scoring, intent signals and routing, usually in Clay and synced to the CRM. A rep should open the day to accounts worth contacting today with the reason attached. Four to six weeks from $9,000.

Book a callGet a free architecture review

Sound familiar?

This is usually what it looks like from the inside.

If two or three of these land, we have built the fix before.

  • Reps spend the first two hours of the day researching instead of selling.

  • Personalisation means inserting a first name into a template.

  • Your enrichment provider returns nulls for a third of the list.

  • Nobody can explain why an account is in the queue today.

  • You bought Clay months ago and it holds one table nobody opens.

How we fix it

What actually changes.

In this order, because getting the order wrong is the usual reason these projects stall.

  1. 01

    Express the ICP as data

    Fields and thresholds a system can filter on, not a paragraph in a deck. Everything downstream depends on this being specific.

  2. 02

    Waterfall the providers

    Ordered by cost and hit rate with fallbacks, so coverage is high and you are not paying premium rates for data the cheap source already had.

  3. 03

    Attach a reason to every account

    Hiring, funding, technology change, site visit or product usage, timestamped. A score with no visible reason gets ignored in a fortnight.

  4. 04

    Hand the tables over

    Your team edits them directly. An outbound engine only you can change is a dependency, not an asset.

The work itself

Services this draws on

Other situations we work on

The real alternative

The other option is hiring someone and teaching them everything.

Most people weigh us against a salary. It is worth being honest about what the salary actually buys, because the wage is the cheapest line in it.

Hire and train someone

Time to first useful output
3 to 6 months
Recruiting and onboarding
4 to 10 weeks before they start
Who trains them
Your most senior person, for months
Who reviews the work
Also your most senior person
Breadth
One person, one skill set
If they leave
The knowledge leaves with them
Annual cost
$95k to $160k, plus benefits and tools

Bring us in

Time to first useful output
Week one, a written scope
Recruiting and onboarding
None. We start inside two weeks
Who trains them
Nobody. We arrive knowing the stack
Who reviews the work
We do, and you see it weekly
Breadth
Product, data, AI, commerce and CRM
If we leave
Documentation and code you already own
Cost
A fixed project fee, agreed before we start

None of this argues against hiring. A permanent team is the right answer once the work is continuous and someone internal can lead it. It is the wrong answer when you need one thing built well, once, and you need it this quarter. We will tell you which situation you are in on the first call.

Book a callSee what things cost

Salary range reflects US market rates for a mid to senior full stack developer or a HubSpot administrator, before employer taxes, benefits, equipment and software. Ramp times are our own observation across client teams rather than a published figure, and yours may be shorter.

Next step

Tell us where you are stuck.

A short call, no deck. We will tell you what we would do, roughly what it costs, and whether you actually need us, sometimes the answer is that you do not.

Book a callGet a free architecture review

Or email newbusiness@hubreven.com