Skip to content
hubreven

Solution

The product exists in a deck and nowhere else

Launching a product means getting the smallest honest version in front of real users: a deployed application with real data and real accounts, not a clickable prototype. Scoped to the single assumption most likely to kill the idea, that takes six to ten weeks and costs $18,000 upward.

Book a callGet a free architecture review

Sound familiar?

This is usually what it looks like from the inside.

If two or three of these land, we have built the fix before.

  • You have been describing it for four months and nobody has used it.

  • The feature list keeps growing and the build keeps not starting.

  • A no code prototype hit its ceiling on the one thing that mattered.

  • An investor wants to see it working, not see the deck again.

  • Your technical cofounder search has taken longer than building it would have.

How we fix it

What actually changes.

In this order, because getting the order wrong is the usual reason these projects stall.

  1. 01

    Cut the scope to one assumption

    We find the belief the whole product rests on and build only what tests it. This conversation is uncomfortable and it is where most of the budget gets saved.

  2. 02

    Build it in the open

    Weekly deploys to a staging URL you can click. No four week silence followed by a reveal that is wrong.

  3. 03

    Instrument before launch

    Event tracking on the actions that answer your question. An MVP that ships without measurement has not tested anything.

  4. 04

    Hand over the keys

    Code in your repository, infrastructure in your accounts, documentation written for a developer who has never met us.

The work itself

Services this draws on

Other situations we work on

The real alternative

The other option is hiring someone and teaching them everything.

Most people weigh us against a salary. It is worth being honest about what the salary actually buys, because the wage is the cheapest line in it.

Hire and train someone

Time to first useful output
3 to 6 months
Recruiting and onboarding
4 to 10 weeks before they start
Who trains them
Your most senior person, for months
Who reviews the work
Also your most senior person
Breadth
One person, one skill set
If they leave
The knowledge leaves with them
Annual cost
$95k to $160k, plus benefits and tools

Bring us in

Time to first useful output
Week one, a written scope
Recruiting and onboarding
None. We start inside two weeks
Who trains them
Nobody. We arrive knowing the stack
Who reviews the work
We do, and you see it weekly
Breadth
Product, data, AI, commerce and CRM
If we leave
Documentation and code you already own
Cost
A fixed project fee, agreed before we start

None of this argues against hiring. A permanent team is the right answer once the work is continuous and someone internal can lead it. It is the wrong answer when you need one thing built well, once, and you need it this quarter. We will tell you which situation you are in on the first call.

Book a callSee what things cost

Salary range reflects US market rates for a mid to senior full stack developer or a HubSpot administrator, before employer taxes, benefits, equipment and software. Ramp times are our own observation across client teams rather than a published figure, and yours may be shorter.

Next step

Tell us where you are stuck.

A short call, no deck. We will tell you what we would do, roughly what it costs, and whether you actually need us, sometimes the answer is that you do not.

Book a callGet a free architecture review

Or email newbusiness@hubreven.com